Political and economic decoupling is increasingly making itself felt in bilateral relations. This is particularly the case with respect to the China-Canada relationship. As a result, there is a clear demand for refocused realism in Sino-Canadian diplomatic relations.
Two years of tension and misunderstanding between China and Canada
The relationship between China and Canada has deteriorated sharply since the end of 2018, when the arrest of Huawei CFO, Meng Wanzhou, took place in Vancouver. Immediately, Beijing retaliated with the arrest of “The Two Michaels” (Kovrig and Spavor, former Canadian diplomat and businessman, respectively). To this day, Chinese authorities are still holding them on espionage charges.
Following this series of events, the two countries embarked on an unprecedented spiral, with trade being the primary sufferer of the fallout from the poisoning of this stormy relationship.
While Canada simply sees itself as responding to a U.S. arrest warrant accusing Huawei’s top leader of circumventing U.S. sanctions against Iran, the Chinese see it differently. Instead, they describe it as an intelligence conspiracy, driven by politically motivated decisions. They suspect Trump interference, with the use of Ms. Wanzhou as a vehicle to put pressure on China.
Given Canada’s view of the situation, the process of extraditing the daughter of the founder of Huawei is to follow its normal course. As such, a new hearing before the Federal Court of Canada is set to commence today. Mrs. Wanzhou, currently under house arrest, attempted to have this hearing annulled.
The Hong-Kong situation has only added fuel to the fire
China has warned about yet another deterioration in bilateral relations after a Hong Kong couple who participated in anti-Chinese protests were granted asylum in Canada. This is yet another issue further aggravating the tense China-Canada relationship.
The Chinese ambassador to Canada, Cong Peiwu, did not mince his words: he assured that this capitulation to political dissidents could have consequences for the “health and safety” of the 300,000 Canadian nationals living in Hong Kong, as well as the many Canadian companies there.
Cherie Wong, Executive Director of the Canada Hong Kong Alliance, called out Cong Peiwu’s comments as a direct threat to all Canadians. For his part, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said China is using “coercive diplomacy” by detaining two Canadians in retaliation.
Shortly after this, Beijing retaliated once again, filing a complaint with the Canadian government, accusing it of condoning the “anti-Chinese” characterization of its comments by the media.
For the record, Trudeau has always sought the support of his allies, but often to no avail. At the virtual summit with China in September, the European Union nevertheless took the step of calling for the release of the two Canadian prisoners. But, of course, Beijing has no intention of letting go.
Towards an easing of tensions in the China-Canada relationship?
Several observers argued that the only possible outcomes of this Sino-Canadian misunderstanding depend on the outcome of the U.S. presidential election. Joe Biden’s victory could thus totally change the situation, bringing the interminable affair to a close. The new U.S. president-elect wants to advocate a multilateral approach with China. This would allow Canada to regain an audible voice to calm the Chinese dragon’s ardor.
Admittedly, Canada is currently looking for new benchmarks to re-establish its relationship with China. Although Justin Trudeau is clearly not a proponent of hostage diplomacy, the idea of negotiating with China for the release of the two prisoners cannot be ruled out.
(Featured image by tee2tee via Pixabay)
DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of CAStocks, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.
This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof.